Comment from Brent Steeves, Nov 9, 2008 6:52pm
That heading is manipulative and misleading! The delegates certainly did NOT unanimously agree on the 'proposals' forwarded to THQ. A small group of individuals given no time to consult with the people they supposedly represented decided what would be 'unanimously' put forward. Further, the top proposals as voted upon by the many delegates were NOT endorsed by those few tasked with 'unanimously' choosing what would be promoted. Finally, nothing more than an endorsement of the illness that has seen our Army decline in the past years was put forward. Really, are ANY of the 'proposals' put forward different from what most Salvationists already believed were in place?
Comment from Lorna Rogers Simard, Nov 17, 2008 7:16pm
Having read the 5 agreed upon statements out of 100's, I conclude that there's nothing new here and/or that if these were the areas of unanimity out of 100's of proposals, then there must have been significant disagreement and not much agreement. I am particularly interested in #1 since two members of our family have to get new uniforms. Should we be paying several hundred dollars for two new uniforms,or should we be buying a less expensive alternative? Having been a delegate at the previous symposium, I found the previous symposium perhaps a little more change oriented - this symposium, as judged by these 5 statements, seems pretty status quo. Not much evidence of out of the box thinking here.
Add Comment